# Si me das 10 MINUTOS, te haré 200 Veces más PRODUCTIVO usando la IA Channel: Tengo un Plan Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYlSucYzRMs Duration: 11 min Language: English Words: 2353 Transcript page: https://viewrankai.com/tools/youtube-transcript/PYlSucYzRMs --- [0:00] On this channel, there are many people looking for tools to improve their lives, and I'm sure the last few years have been like that metal detector, distinguishing what is gold and what is just a piece of rock. Totally. That artificial intelligence is truly worth it in our day-to-day lives. So, before we move on to talk in "pro" mode about improving a company's productivity, let's talk first about productivity in general in our daily lives, the automations you have in place, and how you've really noticed an improvement in your daily life with artificial intelligence. Sure. Look, I think something very important happened this past summer: the arrival of what [0:33] we call true agentic AI, right? Because they've been bending our ears about artificial intelligence agents since 2023. Uh, Microsoft called their internal automations "agents," and that's when the term started to get bastardized. Okay? So, the artificial intelligence agent concept didn't work for a long time, and now we're paying the price. Now we talk about agents and people say , "This is crap, it doesn't work. I [0:54] tried this in 2024 and it didn't work. It still doesn't work." No, now these are real agents that actually work, right? So, I think we're at a very sweet spot where AI is now really exceeding expectations, because for a long time, people...what I've encountered most when I come to a company to train them or whatever— I've been at BBVA, Santander, MediaMarkt, Cuatrecasas, a ton of different places, uh, a lot of companies in these 4 years or 3-plus years, uh, training workers, right? And I've always found the same thing. "It's just that when I upload an Excel, it doesn't go well.""It's just that when I [1:27] upload a 200-page PDF, it gets lost." Man, in the last 4 months, I haven't found anyone who picks it apart, who, when they start using it, finds that it isn't capable of doing something they wanted to do. So we're at a very sweet moment where using it actually works and provides an absolutely huge return, right? Which is why I think it's a moment that makes things easier because , suddenly, it's no longer just for certain use cases; now it's for practically everything. So the important moment this summer is the [1:52] appearance of ChatGPT Work. Work is a new way of working with AI that literally appeared in July, okay? And what this new system does is that instead of using it on the webpage, you use it on your computer, meaning you download an application, whether it's Mac or Windows, and you use ChatGPT Work. So, what is the difference between ChatGPT Work and the traditional chat? Well, the traditional chat was an idea where you talked and [2:17] it answered you, you took turns. Yes. In ChatGPT Work, you give it a goal, a task, and it starts working asynchronously on its own until it finishes and comes to find you, even asking you questions along the way. Right, it's delegating instead of cooperating. Yes. So, instead of doing things with AI, you ask the AI to do things. So, that point of transition is gigantic for productivity because it really works very well. Furthermore, people will see that if they go on the web, they have the option to use Work on the web, but that uses an OpenAI computer. What's cool is that it uses your computer because you have all your [2:50] files that you give it permission to access, you have all your applications that you give it permission to access, and you have your whole life there. I mean, basically, you have your digital ecosystem within the reach of the artificial intelligence, provided you give it permission once again. Okay. This isn't the one that costs € 500 a month. No, no, no. This is actually in free accounts; it's even in the free accounts, okay? So, this is a desktop application: you download it and, from [3:11] there on, it works in a different way. And that way, basically, instead of telling it tasks and how you want it done, you give it your problems, and some of them you don't even know how to solve, because the AI, in some cases, is smarter than you. So, from there, the AI gets to work, and the whole hassle of uploading a file, and a week later wanting to talk about the same topic and having to re-upload the same [3:30] file so it has context, is over. Automatically, the AI already has all the context; you can do it by folders, you can give it access to your whole computer, whatever you want, and it also works on your computer in parallel while you can keep working on your computer, so it doesn't block your computer either. And what I see many people doing now is buying a lower-quality computer to keep it running, because I, for example, have automated tasks, every Monday it does this, and sometimes my computer isn't [3:52] on Monday, so I can't do it. Sure, you can do it that way. And that's like setting up a server, which you can do for these kinds of things, but technically you can do it with your own computer perfectly fine now. I see a lot of people who leave their work computer plugged in, and from their home computer, they connect with that thing called remote that Chatty has, uh , which lets you connect remotely to the same ChatGPT, so, in the end, you work with the same one from different devices, right? This is what I have at the office. I have a server, a very powerful computer where I have both [4:18] audiovisual AIs, local ones, etc., and there is ChatGPT. And I connect from my phone, I connect from this or that, and right now I can pick up my phone as if I were on my computer and tell ChatGPT to do something, okay? So, that's really cool, but it's a little more advanced. In general, for the people watching us who want to try this, the main difference is going to be downloading the application, using it on the computer, and from there, starting up exactly what that AI is that can work for you. How many times have snake oil salesmen promised us, no , that AI works for you, that while [4:49] you're sipping a daiquiri, the AI can be working for you, right? It was true. Now AI is starting to work for you. You're not going to be able to sip a daiquiri on the beach and rake in buckets of cash, okay? But the reality is that right now you can delegate work to AI. For example, the latest thing we've done internally, we're testing it , is we've told the AI to edit the [5:08] video we make every Monday. How is it? It's...Incredible, because we've given it the history of the projects our video editors have done, and with that history, it has the resources, the clips, what it includes, the transitions it uses. But does it open the editing app or is it with the same... It opens Premiere, man. Damn, it opens Premiere and gets to work. And like I was saying, it’s not super optimal in Premiere, but the truth is you don’t even need Premiere to make cuts and build a timeline. You don't even need Premiere, but man, it edits a video in 3 hours that takes my editor [5:38] eight. Yeah. And the result is very similar. For example, with shorts, for the podcast, you have to put out shorts. Man, we’ve built a skill inside ChatGPT that takes the video, makes the cuts, transcribes it, and decides which are the best lines based on what AI can reason today, which is very capable, man. It’s not, I mean, we often have people doing jobs who aren’t exactly the brightest, but that’s what you’ve got, right? I mean, at the end of the day, not all of our workers are necessarily Einsteins, you know? So, sometimes you put people to do things and you think, "Man, if I had cut the [6:10] podcast myself, I would have chosen a different line," you know? So, yeah, ChatGPT performs really well, man. I mean, in the high-level paid versions, this performs incredibly well. So, it gets the transcription, finds the lines , cuts the video based on those lines, puts the trailer together, adds the transitions, and there you go, you know ? So it starts doing things that really add a lot of value. It’s no longer just an editor working with AI, it’s things of great value. And don't even get me started on legal matters; in document review, there’s a benchmark that defines that AI does it 20%better than a senior lawyer, but it does it [6:48] 100 times faster and at 0.03%of the cost. Wow, that's gone down. Of course, my lawyer charges me a fortune per hour, I’m not going to tolerate that the value they bring me is just document review. ChatGPT already does that, man. Use ChatGPT and bring me value in another way, you know? And I'll gladly keep paying you, but find how you're going to add value that isn't what ChatGPT is doing, because otherwise, [7:10] I'm just going to do it with ChatGPT. And that’s a bit of the dichotomy we’re in right now. Everyone has to, whether they like it or not, use the tool that’s making their value obsolete, because it’s the only way to keep adding value. So, if you refuse and start fighting it, saying "I don't want to use ChatGPT because if I use it , it’ll take my job," it’s going to take it away from you ruthlessly, absolutely ruthlessly. If you don't use artificial intelligence, you’re going to have a very hard time; you won't be up to the task. There’s one thing I always say that I think people should [7:38] get tattooed: the new mediocrity is called excellence, and anyone who isn't excellent won't make the cut. You’re going to expect delivery in 24 hours and not 48, just like what happens today with Amazon. I mean, what happens now when a local store has to deliver a package, like sneakers you’ve bought, if they take 72 hours to deliver, you say, "Damn, how slow is this?" Because you’re used to Amazon’s 24 hours, as it’s the new standard. Well, this is going to happen with everything; the new standard, thanks to AI, will be excellence. You’ll expect to be answered on the phone without having to listen to hold music in customer [8:11] service. Right. Why should I have to waste 5 minutes of my life on the phone when an artificial intelligence could perfectly well assist me and automatically handle millions of people in parallel? You know? So I don't need to listen to hold music on the phone. Or when you go for anything, any service, like a graphic designer, you’ll expect a 24-hour turnaround and not a week. Or when it comes to retouching the photos you took for your wedding, you’ll expect to be given the wedding album at the reception and not 6 months later, like wedding photographers do. All this is [8:42] going to become the new standard. There’s no fog there, eh, you can see it clearly now. Yes, here you see it very clearly. So, the problem will be that I'm used to that standard, and then a service provider comes along and tells me, "No, you'll have the quote next week." Next week, you know? What do you mean "next week," you know? I mean, look, it happened to me recently. I'm putting something in the house I have in the mountains, and we are doing, we have to make a concrete slab, okay? The typical kind of thing. Man, we asked six guys for a quote. We already signed the [9:10] first one before the other five even sent us the quote. Right, professionalism, that's the basic stuff. But it's not even professional anymore, it’s standard; it’s the minimum you require from someone, if you answer me first, you take the prize. Well, starting from there, if you have a marketing firm, an insurance company, if you have...I don't care what it is, you owe it to the client to offer a service; and if not, you're an employee of a company that offers a service to the client, so it's the same thing. So, in the end, the new standard is going to be excellence, and if you don't measure up, you're out. It’s really [9:37] easy to understand. So, from there, what you have to see is that this is not optional. And I often find when I go to companies to train them, I find people who say, "No, I don't like artificial intelligence.""Dude, I'm sorry, but I don't care." I mean, your boss said that we have to apply artificial intelligence. What difference does it make if you like it or not? It's not about whether you like it, it's about doing what needs to be done. And from that point on, when people understand it's not optional, they handle it much better, man. I mean , the biggest drama is usually that point where people realize it's not [10:06] something they have to like, that it's just something that needs to be done, and that just as we once had to learn computer science or once had to learn how to browse the internet, this is what needs to be done. Exactly. Hey, John, it catches my attention that you only mentioned ChatGPT, and, of course, I just switched from Gemini to Claude, and it's the worst thing I've done because you train it...Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini, whatever, you have it trained, it knows you, I mean, even your tastes, even your favorite dish, and suddenly the typical video: "The new Claude option is amazing," and you switch. So I have two questions. First, [10:38] that is the mistake, eh, switching is the mistake. --- About this transcript Read from YouTube's own caption track and laid out by ViewRank AI (https://viewrankai.com). ViewRank AI finds the videos already beating a creator's own average on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube Shorts, transcribes them from the audio itself in more than 60 languages, and turns what worked into new ideas and scripts. Free transcript tools, no account needed: https://viewrankai.com/tools How to read any video this way: https://viewrankai.com/llms.txt